3 ms·

I like the idea of concepts, categories, and data but I had trouble seeing how it fits into the traditional knowledge graph structure of tuples that I am used t

I like the idea of concepts, categories, and data but I had trouble seeing how it fits into the traditional knowledge graph structure of tuples that I am used to.

udp 4y ago
OWL2 does a good job of formalising these things. What they call concepts and categories would be Classes in OWL. What they call data would be Individuals.
- katsi111 4y ago
  The concepts are Classes in OWL and the categories are individuals of rdf:type Category.
prometheus76 4y ago
Another analogy I can think of is food-related. The concept would be "bread". The categories would be "recipes for bread". The data would be "bread ingredients".
unboxingelf 4y ago
(Product) -> (bookshelf) -> (billy white 80cm) The above would be the graph representation of concepts, categories, and data. In RDF triple terms of subject-predicate-object it could be represented as: Product (s) has a (p) bookshelf (o) Billy white 80cm (s) is a (a) bookshelf (o)
- katsi111 4y ago
  It is actually (in pseudo RDF): [BILLY bookcase in white 80x28x202 cm] rdf:type :Product . Product rdf:type :Class . [BILLY bookcase in white 80x28x202 cm] :categorisedAs :bookcase . :bookCase rdf:type :Category . *[ ] = IRI of that particular product