3 ms·
And yet history has usually proven them right to have this kind of attitude. The first instance of everything is ludicrously expensive and commercially non-viab
by marcus_holmes 4y ago
And yet history has usually proven them right to have this kind of attitude. The first instance of everything is ludicrously expensive and commercially non-viable as it is. Then it gets cheaper and easier and eventually commonplace and boring.
It's often the case that the commercial applications for a technology are not apparent to the researchers doing the research. They're focusing on the science/engineering challenges. Later, sometimes much later, it becomes part of an economically-viable product or service.
- pfdietz 4y agoThis is survivor bias showing its face. Sure, for successful technologies, naysayers were wrong. But almost all technologies (sufficiently finely defined) fail. The naysayers are usually right.
- eternalban 4y agoGiven the massive payoff to humanity if this technology comes on line, it is perfectly reasonable to have this attitude.