4 ms·
If you think about it, humanity goes into the direction of spending considerable effort not to hurt innocent people. But the companies found dealing with excep
by twawaaay 4y ago
If you think about it, humanity goes into the direction of spending considerable effort not to hurt innocent people.
But the companies found dealing with exceptions is costly and decided to optimise themselves by not dealing with exceptions at all.
This is like our governments saying we are paying too much for judicial system and prisons and so from now on we will allow lynchings and anybody caught doing anything wrong is going to be shot.
- koonsolo 4y agoI think the "innocent until proven guilty" rule that we have in our justice system prevents things like this to happen (best effort of course). But for these companies, it's probably easier and cheaper to do the "guilty until proven innocent" strategy. That's probably also the reason why they don't want to disclose why he was banned, because he could make a stronger case for himself.
- twawaaay 4y ago> But for these companies, it's probably easier and cheaper to do the "guilty until proven innocent" strategy. Well, they don't even want to get into that "proven innocent" part. They would very much like to decide fault as quickly as possible without the hassle of actually having to prove anything.
- eastbound 4y ago> This is like our governments saying we are paying too much for judicial system and prisons and so from now on we will allow lynchings and anybody caught doing anything wrong is going to be shot. It’s kind of what have been happening recently. There is too much crime for governments to handle, so they leave criminals alone and only fine the willing citizens who pose no risk. In France it’s impossible to get a theft, beating-up, knife attack complaint processed, and rape counts are “dealt with” at the police station level, rarely going to a court.