4 ms·
I don't see how this changes the argument. x% improvement on the issue of sunscreen in the ocean can be made by removing the shower, where x is probably small.
by creato 4y ago
I don't see how this changes the argument. x% improvement on the issue of sunscreen in the ocean can be made by removing the shower, where x is probably small.
- eesmith 4y agoIf I understand the article, combined with my paltry understanding of the law, the argument is the shower should be treated as a point source, which is covered under certain existing legislation. Bathing is not a point source, so is covered by different legislation. Point-sources can have higher concentrations in a small area, like the sand near the showers. These need to be addressed even if the non-point sources are also an issue.
- ceejayoz 4y agoThere’s poop in the ocean, but you don’t want to swim in the sewage plant’s outlet before it dilutes, right? Same for corals.