> there's believers here that believe in psychology equivalent of flat earth That is clearly hyperbole, as is the equivocation with horoscopes mentioned in the

> there's believers here that believe in psychology equivalent of flat earth That is clearly hyperbole, as is the equivocation with horoscopes mentioned in the article you linked. In both instances, the argument is hurting your case. Look, I agree that the big 5 is superior. But the MBTI traits are clearly rough first approximations of traits discovered by more rigorous science - not just pure superstition.