3 ms·
Well, it's better, for one. Instead of the money potentially being used by the government, where on paper everyone is a shareholder. Now you pass that money t
by oblio 4y ago
Well, it's better, for one.
Instead of the money potentially being used by the government, where on paper everyone is a shareholder.
Now you pass that money to a company, where the beneficiaries are a restricted set of shareholders and top executives.
Much better!