I’d love to see a thorough breakdown of what that opposing stance is. How is medicine, a service that is non-negotiable (e.g. you can die without it) in a posit

I’d love to see a thorough breakdown of what that opposing stance is. How is medicine, a service that is non-negotiable (e.g. you can die without it) in a position to work without problems in a completely free market? I’m any free market, you vote with your wallet, but that’s impossible if you don’t have time to switch providers or if forces outside of the free market dictate price? I’d love for us to just say “let the market sort it out”, but that generally requires presumptions that aren’t universally true for all goods or services.