4 ms·
No, you ask yourself. It was claimed "Lots of people are driven by pain and discomfort, not guilted, into euthanasia." It's incumbent on the person making an a
by Cupertino95014 4y ago
No, you ask yourself.
It was claimed "Lots of people are driven by pain and discomfort, not guilted, into euthanasia." It's incumbent on the person making an assertion to support it.
- ivalm 4y agoYou claimed without proof: > As for "voluntary" euthanasia: don't even start. There is no such thing. Your old father doesn't want to be a burden, but he's helpless, and it's all too easy to "convince" him to take the pill. This claim can be refuted by providing even one case of voluntary euthanasia, which at this point you can see in the replies.
- Cupertino95014 4y ago.. and you claimed without proof also. You didn't say there was "one person," you said there were "lots of people." So prove it.
- ivalm 4y agoLots of people is just more than one. It’s not a quantified concept. Anyways, I’m happy to say “some” instead of “lots of”, my main point is that these people exist, that’s why I replied to your comment.