3 ms·
You seem to be confirming nightpool's comment. That this is an intentionally-limited release. I think that's fine. It's good to have an adblocker that uses m
by SquareWheel 4y ago
You seem to be confirming nightpool's comment. That this is an intentionally-limited release.
I think that's fine. It's good to have an adblocker that uses minimal permissions. But it seems like people will use this to argue that MV3 is less capable than it really is. Maybe UBO Plus (MV3) will come later that enables those feature.
- gorhill 4y agoIt can never be "plus" compared to what uBO is currently with MV2, there are features and capabilities that can't be ported to MV3.
- SquareWheel 4y agoI understand that, but it seems like the most frequently-used features (eg. cosmetic filtering) are possible in MV3. So a version with those features included would still offer value. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems most of the missing capabilities are power user features - even by HN standards. It's of course your discretion if that's something you wish to work on. I think a Minus and Plus version (or "Regular" if you prefer) offer a nice option for users to choose between. But I understand if the development overhead of managing two versions cannot be justified.