4 ms·
Because sending different content based on the content-type the user-agent asks for, e.g. with the "Accept:" header, has explicitly been part of the HTTP spec s
by Karellen 4y ago
Because sending different content based on the content-type the user-agent asks for, e.g. with the "Accept:" header, has explicitly been part of the HTTP spec since version 1.1 in 1997?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068#section-12 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068#section-12
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068#section-14.1 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068#section-14.1
See also https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Content_negotiation https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Content_ne...
(FWIW - I don't know if that's how `bzr` does this, but it might, and the concept is 25 years old now.)
Edit: s/different content/different representations of the same resource/
- unwind 4y agoTrue of course, didn't think about that. I'm not a web developer. :) Still think it's weird and kind of against my feeling for the spirit of a URI, but that's just me. Thanks.