5 ms·

You may already know but it's SQL-ite (sequel-ite), like graphite, dynamite, sulfite. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-ite https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-ite

srcreigh 4y ago
Not even Sequel-ite. But S.Q.L.-ite. That's how Dr Hipp says it, anyways.
- sgbeal 4y ago
  FWIW... i've been in Richard's presence several times when he was asked how to pronounce it by various people and he's invariably answered, "pronounce it however you like!" (i belong to the ess-queue-lite school of thought.)
- dec0dedab0de 4y ago
  I love when projects have cute puns in the name. I always am sure to correct people so they don't miss out on the fun. Luckily most developers are pedantic and like language enough that they don't get too annoyed with me. Same thing applies to PostgreSQL, it drives me nuts that sqlalchemy is not sqlchemy. completely off topic at this point, but Jim Cornette reading paid advertisements for codecademy was very funny during the pandemic. He insisted on pronouncing it code-cademy while his co-host tried to correct him.
geewee 4y ago
Huh, I had no idea!
avgcorrection 4y ago
Such ambigious names remind of “Rust”. It’s such an um-actually name (um actually it’s not first and foremost about oxidization it’s about fungi…)
- randomdata 4y ago
  > it’s not first and foremost about oxidization it’s about fungi… Um, actually this[1] suggests that it originally wasn't about anything other than seeming like a good name and that any deeper explanation that has been given was made up. Of course, by the same token, "it seemed like a good name" could have also been made up. But it appears that the team eventually embraced it in the oxidization[2] sense. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/27jvdt/internet_archaeology_the_definitive_endall_source/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/27jvdt/internet_archa... [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680521 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680521
  - avgcorrection 4y ago
    Um actually I believe more in community consensus with regards to naming provenance as opposed to authorial intent ad nauseam
    - randomdata 4y ago
      Fair, but community consensus is that of oxidization to reflect how the Rust community comes in, takes over, and ruins every discussion about programming by finding some way to mention Rust. It is very much a virtual oxidization process. Case in point: This discussion was originally about SQLite.
EGreg 4y ago
I had no idea! I was sure it was “SQL Lite” ever since I heard about it a decade ago. Its support for mostly text strings while MySQL and Postgres supported a myriad types made me think it’s just a small embedded “lite” library for when you wanted to bundle a mostly SQL database with your app lol

srcreigh 4y ago

Not even Sequel-ite. But S.Q.L.-ite. That's how Dr Hipp says it, anyways.

sgbeal 4y ago
FWIW... i've been in Richard's presence several times when he was asked how to pronounce it by various people and he's invariably answered, "pronounce it however you like!" (i belong to the ess-queue-lite school of thought.)
dec0dedab0de 4y ago
I love when projects have cute puns in the name. I always am sure to correct people so they don't miss out on the fun. Luckily most developers are pedantic and like language enough that they don't get too annoyed with me. Same thing applies to PostgreSQL, it drives me nuts that sqlalchemy is not sqlchemy. completely off topic at this point, but Jim Cornette reading paid advertisements for codecademy was very funny during the pandemic. He insisted on pronouncing it code-cademy while his co-host tried to correct him.

geewee 4y ago

Huh, I had no idea!

avgcorrection 4y ago

Such ambigious names remind of “Rust”. It’s such an um-actually name (um actually it’s not first and foremost about oxidization it’s about fungi…)

randomdata 4y ago
> it’s not first and foremost about oxidization it’s about fungi… Um, actually this[1] suggests that it originally wasn't about anything other than seeming like a good name and that any deeper explanation that has been given was made up. Of course, by the same token, "it seemed like a good name" could have also been made up. But it appears that the team eventually embraced it in the oxidization[2] sense. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/27jvdt/internet_archaeology_the_definitive_endall_source/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/27jvdt/internet_archa... [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680521 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680521
- avgcorrection 4y ago
  Um actually I believe more in community consensus with regards to naming provenance as opposed to authorial intent ad nauseam
  - randomdata 4y ago
    Fair, but community consensus is that of oxidization to reflect how the Rust community comes in, takes over, and ruins every discussion about programming by finding some way to mention Rust. It is very much a virtual oxidization process. Case in point: This discussion was originally about SQLite.

EGreg 4y ago

I had no idea! I was sure it was “SQL Lite” ever since I heard about it a decade ago. Its support for mostly text strings while MySQL and Postgres supported a myriad types made me think it’s just a small embedded “lite” library for when you wanted to bundle a mostly SQL database with your app lol