> I guess 4GB seemed like a reasonable limit when FAT32 was designed. FAT32 was always seen as stop-gap measure for low-end consumer hardware when introduced i

> I guess 4GB seemed like a reasonable limit when FAT32 was designed. FAT32 was always seen as stop-gap measure for low-end consumer hardware when introduced in 1996; NTFS was introduced 3 years prior to handle terabyte-scale data for enterprise users. > Most likely FAT32 has a 32bit number for file size and ExFAT presumably has either a 64bit one Correct.