2 ms·
> “quiet quitters” [...] meaning they fulfill their job description but [...] No. There is no room for a "but" there. Calling people "quitters" for doing their
by DarkWiiPlayer 4y ago
> “quiet quitters” [...] meaning they fulfill their job description but [...]
No. There is no room for a "but" there. Calling people "quitters" for doing their job is ridiculous. If you need your workers to do more than their contract says, change their contract. If they don't want that, pay them more. If you don't want to pay them more money for more work, sucks for you I guess.
- wldcordeiro 4y agoRight? This whole framing of it as "quiet quitting" is intentional to make the workers look bad. This is "work to rule"[1] and it's interesting even this name is seen as a form of protest when it should be the norm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-to-rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-to-rule