4 ms·
It's not. Did you read the article? Only a small slice of the very small amount of money goes back to the game developers, and then those developers are the top
by nestlequ1k 15y ago
It's not. Did you read the article? Only a small slice of the very small amount of money goes back to the game developers, and then those developers are the top 1%. The rest get very little.
I think his point has merit, that its limiting the amount of good games that come out. It's just too risky of a proposition to develop an indie game.
It's all very interesting, but personally I don't care. It's games... these efforts aren't terribly useful to society. They should live and be well, but we don't need to be all that concerned about "saving the poor indie game developers". These people could easily make tons of money developing other things, but they choose to pursue their dream of game development. They don't need to be coddled.
- ido 15y agopersonally I don't care. It's games... these efforts aren't terribly useful to society. I disagree- unless you think movies, music, books and art also aren't terribly useful to society?