It's only to protect from mass-scraping. In practice it's easily circumventeable for legitimate purposes, as mentioned in the example: "However, the reuse or th

It's only to protect from mass-scraping. In practice it's easily circumventeable for legitimate purposes, as mentioned in the example: "However, the reuse or the extraction of only one case law file or insubstantial parts of case law is freely available." The extension mentioned in the original post, for example, would not infringe it.