4 ms·
This is an excellent argument against private banks. Financial infrastructure should not be in the hands of private corporations.
by dusted 4y ago
This is an excellent argument against private banks.
Financial infrastructure should not be in the hands of private corporations.
- bongoman37 4y ago
- logicchains 4y ago>Financial infrastructure should not be in the hands of private corporations. What makes you think public banks would be any better. Have you ever been to the DMV? At least with private banks you have the chance to switch to a less shitty bank or credit union; with a public bank you have no chance.
- minerva23 4y agoCalifornia’s DMVs are better than many private companies. They have walk-in times posted on the web. Friendly customer service. Security. Ample seating. A lot of self-service options. I honestly like the California DMV.
- ciupicri 4y agoFinancial infrastructure should be in the hands of private citizens, i.e. cash or cryptocurrencies.
- dismalpedigree 4y agoThis is almost assuredly caused by a private bank being forced to comply with AML laws from a public regulatory body. How would a public bank be any better?
- codefreeordie 4y agoI trust my private bank much more than I do the government to act in my best interest.