3 ms·
Absolutely, my ideal would be for the canonical form in the codebase to just be the abstract token. It would have one or more possible names stored in the codeb
by iamevn 4y ago
Absolutely, my ideal would be for the canonical form in the codebase to just be the abstract token. It would have one or more possible names stored in the codebase. Then each developer would be able to choose the names they'd prefer to see and type in their editors. (Decoupling the name of a code unit from the actual reference to/implementation of it is one of the things I'm really excited about in the Unison programming language.)
- spicybright 4y agoThat would make it extremely difficult to talk to anyone else about the code though, no? You'd have to spend time finding and learning the "common" ground between every fellow developer you talk to.