2 ms·
> > Any guess on why people's experiences with spam are so diverse? > That would be an interesting research project. Indeed. When you say get spam, do you mea
by jjav 4y ago
> > Any guess on why people's experiences with spam are so diverse?
> That would be an interesting research project.
Indeed. When you say get spam, do you mean pre or post-filtering?
Over the last 30 days (I don't keep them longer than that) I've received 43 spam emails which were sent to the spam folder (so I wouldn't ever see these, other than because I went and looked now for the sake of this discussion). In the same time period there was only 1 spam email which was missed by spamprobe and made it into my inbox spool.
There's a fair amount of would-be spam that gets blocked during the SMTP transaction due to things like bogus host in HELO, etc. I don't keep any stats on those, I did at one time but it was too much noise.
My email isn't secret, it should be on every spammer list I'd guess. It has been the same since the mid 90s and is all over usenet, email list archives, websites, etc and I've never made any effort to mask it.
- zimpenfish 4y ago> Indeed. When you say get spam, do you mean pre or post-filtering? All my numbers are post-rspamd. There's still sieve after that which does the "is it scored more than X?" to redirect into spam/not-spam. > There's a fair amount of would-be spam that gets blocked during the SMTP transaction Yeah, the blocklists and protocol strictness rules definitely cut down a lot before it even gets to rspamd.