> the voter actually watched the content (or owns the product etc) How much of a bad show does a viewer have to subject themselves to before their review is al

> the voter actually watched the content (or owns the product etc) How much of a bad show does a viewer have to subject themselves to before their review is allowed to count? If watching 30 minutes then tapping out doesn't count, then you're artificially skewing the reviews towards those who like it. Also, Amazon is promoting the popularity of the show by saying 25 million people "sampled" it. Using the word "sampled" leads me to believe they're counting people who only watched a portion of it, perhaps only a few minutes. To count those people as having viewed it, but to invalidate reviews from such people, seems like Amazon is trying to have their cake and eat it too.