3 ms·
I wonder if Meta ever ran its own political ads, without a specific candidate paying for them. That might be one reason to obscure the advertiser. (I mean, they
by TechBro8615 4y ago
I wonder if Meta ever ran its own political ads, without a specific candidate paying for them. That might be one reason to obscure the advertiser. (I mean, they _definitely_ did this with generic "get out and vote" advertising, but of course that's not overtly favoring one candidate or the other.)
- diab0lic 4y agoIt could be favoring one over the other if they biased to display to specific demographics.
- christkv 4y agoDepends if it’s geographically targeted to favor your choice political candidate. Say only run get out the vote for people that are likely to vote for candidate A over B
- lozenge 4y agoZuckerberg has so much money, it would be cheaper and less risky to just pay somebody to pay somebody to pay somebody to fund a PAC with offshore accounts with hidden ownership.
- jimmygrapes 4y agoJust open a movie studio, money laundering problem solved!