You are quoting the discussion part I was quoting - which is the point I was trying to make. Their conclusion there is on-par with existing scientific consensus

You are quoting the discussion part I was quoting - which is the point I was trying to make. Their conclusion there is on-par with existing scientific consensus and nothing new. The silly part was the misleading title/abstract - the reason I was pointing to the (obvious and well established) conclusion of "people who don't eat meat need to supplement their diet with fortified foods or pills" is the claim "Approximately Half of Total Protein Intake by Adults Must Be Animal-Based".