I actually assume the policy is fine. Part of policy is, necessarily, enforcement. In any safety critical policy, there is someone that holds final accountabili

I actually assume the policy is fine. Part of policy is, necessarily, enforcement. In any safety critical policy, there is someone that holds final accountability. That accountability is the pressure, the policy, that guarantees the policy is followed. This is why we have the enforcement of laws, and not just the laws themselves. Criminal negligence is a possibility, happens frequently, and is enforced often, around safety critical systems. If there’s no enforcement, then the policy is fiction. I highly recommend you look into accountability, in safety critical systems. There are many many decades of policy/data that show accountability is a necessary component. Is what keeps them honest/careful. (I’ll try to be back with references and a good example)