I think it's an apt comparison, Zig vs. C, given that Zig intends to replace C. Go was aiming to be a replacement for C as well, but they didn't even try to re

I think it's an apt comparison, Zig vs. C, given that Zig intends to replace C. Go was aiming to be a replacement for C as well, but they didn't even try to reach that goal because Go programs require an OS to run on; something must host the runtime, even though it's included in the binary. I love Go and I dislike C quite a bit. Zig vs. C seems fair to me, because there are no Zig zealots (or very few, at least not yet) and there are no C zealots who have lots of experience with C.