Seems to assuming compounding returns instead of diminishing marginal returns. Why is this assumption meaningful and not just rhetoric? I could write the invers

Seems to assuming compounding returns instead of diminishing marginal returns. Why is this assumption meaningful and not just rhetoric? I could write the inverse article by substitution. > The problem is that a life without commitment is a life spent hugging the X-Axis. Its awesome because the y-axis is unlabeled. Up is good donchaknow.