It is considered a more genuine take, yes. When posed as a series of questions as such, it is meant in a sense to lead while initially posing as genuine curiosi

It is considered a more genuine take, yes. When posed as a series of questions as such, it is meant in a sense to lead while initially posing as genuine curiosity. To level set, genuine and very general curiosity is maybe the most typical feature that holds this community together. IMHO A more genuine approach would be to list the key points and why they are compelling to one of that persuasion. Or alternatively, to more directly take a position: "I find the lab leak hypothesis compelling, and TFA/primary objection's don't explain <fact 1> or <observation 2>" etc.