> a language can be both easy to read and provide a way to avoid that larger code-bases turn into spaghetti. "easy" is always relative, so compared to what? Co

> a language can be both easy to read and provide a way to avoid that larger code-bases turn into spaghetti. "easy" is always relative, so compared to what? Compared to a language that isn't well crafted? Sure. And in practice, most languages could be optimized a lot. But that is not what I was talking about and thinking like that only distracts you from the bigger picture.