4 ms·
I'm wondering why OP is accumulating down votes. As far as I understand the situation the posting is correct.
by jabiko 4y ago
I'm wondering why OP is accumulating down votes. As far as I understand the situation the posting is correct.
- glogla 4y agoOP is rabid anti-nuclear person with an axe to grind. It gets boring after a while, especially with rabid anti-nuclear people being partially responsible for the current crisis. If it wasn't for them, Europe would be much less dependent on Russia.
- mschuster91 4y agoHN tends to be fairly pro-nuclear, which is not surprising given that the majority of its users are in the US which doesn't have a lot of the problems Europe has with nuclear - they have more than enough space to build nuclear plants safely away from population centers, earthquake-prone areas or flood-prone coasts or to store the waste.
- lapinot 4y agoFor pro-nuclear HN people that want to read about themselves, here's a pretty honest analysis: https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2022/08/ROBIN/64951 https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2022/08/ROBIN/64951 (in french)
- jabiko 4y agoIt seems like the situation has resolved itself, at least the posting is not grey anymore. I think that being pro-nuclear actually can make sense until there is enough renewable capacity installed. Its IMHO better than firing coal and generating more CO2. Also we already have nuclear waste, so we are already in a unfavorable situation and producing some more is probably the better tradeoff than ruining our climate. In my opinion, the safety of these power plants is, however, the biggest pain point that is not solved and will likely never be. We still should work towards renewables so nuclear power can become a thing of the past.