4 ms·
That’s a hell of a disclaimer after a decently alarmist comment. You may be correct, but I’m not sure it’s appropriate for you to raise that point given the con
by pwpw 4y ago
That’s a hell of a disclaimer after a decently alarmist comment. You may be correct, but I’m not sure it’s appropriate for you to raise that point given the conflict of interest.
- bombcar 4y agoI would have simply reversed the order of the post. "We're building padloc because we see no way to avoid X Y Z"
- drstewart 4y agoSeriously, talk about burying the lede.
- Quarrelsome 4y agodisclaimer is good tho.
- libria 4y agoI fear for this world if one cannot responsibly process the data they're given after all the cards are put on the table.
- bordercases 4y ago
- purim 4y agoThe only conflict of interest here is the VC looking for a quick exit as rates are rising and your comment shooting down what appears to be a bootstrapped alternative/competition. Althought I wonder how much it will take for this padloc fellow to turn around and announce that he decided to accept VC or even worse, issuing tokens on Ethereum. We are almost at the Minsky moment and lot of founders are going to realize they no longer own the companies built.