4 ms·
Usually when someone has some trouble, if you can help you do your part, and the trouble isn't your fault. But when the issue is wealth inequality, the wealthi
by lupire 4y ago
Usually when someone has some trouble, if you can help you do your part, and the trouble isn't your fault.
But when the issue is wealth inequality, the wealthier person can help, but doesn't want to, out of selfish greed, and is on the "team" that is at fault. The wealthy person is either wracked with guilt (and a hypocrite for not acting) or is an entitled jerk.
Unless the employer are paying the cleaner a good wage (almost never happens), there is direct responsibility.
- gbersac 4y agoDo the wealthy really have to feel sorry for being wealthy when others aren't?
- golergka 4y ago> is on the "team" that is at fault He's not.
- RHSeeger 4y ago> Usually when someone has some trouble, if you can help you do your part, and the trouble isn't your fault. There will always be someone that you can help. And there will always be another charity that wants your money. In many of those cases, the person or charity is a worthy cause. But you cannot help all of them, so you must decide which ones are important the most important to _you_ to help. When you turn away a charity because you've already decided to give to different ones, that doesn't mean you think the charity is unworthy, nor does it mean that you're a bad person for not giving to _that_ charity;