Looks like a non-story really. Anyone can review the page history [1]: Page was of interest, got vandalized [5] , got reverted [4] several times, particularly

Looks like a non-story really. Anyone can review the page history [1]: Page was of interest, got vandalized [5] , got reverted [4] several times, particularly problematic edits were oversighted [2] , eventually page got semi-protected [3] so editor workload was reduced. Libelous edits were removed. All this in < 24 hours. Possibly some bored (teenagers) during lunch break? This is exactly how the system is supposed to work by the way. People should be aware that there can be a short window between when vandalism appears and when it gets caught. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arshdeep_Singh_(cricketer)&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arshdeep_Singh_(c... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Oversight https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Oversight [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Semi-protection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Se... [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism