3 ms·
Git for static site versioning? Why not just copy the HTML into a new folder? Takes seconds. Zero complexity. Gets backed up with your regular system backups.
by reaperducer 4y ago
Git for static site versioning? Why not just copy the HTML into a new folder? Takes seconds. Zero complexity. Gets backed up with your regular system backups.
Git is great for collaborative or complex projects, but for a static site, you're using a freight train to bring a single tomato to market.
- pdimitar 4y agoWell, even though I can reinvent `git diff` I still don't want to. GIT gives me good diffs and I don't view it as an unnecessary overhead. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- monsieurbanana 4y agoI'm fairly certain that was a joke