4 ms·
I think you are using a definition of evidence normally associated with criminal trials here, and not scientific evidence.
by mortehu 4y ago
I think you are using a definition of evidence normally associated with criminal trials here, and not scientific evidence.
- chaosbolt 4y agoYeah sure I need to bring you mathematical irrefutable proof that some event happened, but you can just call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever new words go with it today: racist, sexist, religious, bigot, homophobe, transphobe, etc. with 0 evidence.
- Simon_O_Rourke 4y agoTouché - and that m'lud is why even the best barristers seldom get awarded the Nobel prize in any of the sciences.
- hcrean 4y agoAre you saying that our justice system is un-scientific? lol
- hackerNoose 4y agoThis is more akin to a criminal case where science can be used as evidence.
- Beltiras 4y agoMost journals require more evidence than what passes as such in a court of law. On the say-so of a dog can amount to evidence in some courts. Specifically talking about K9s granting reasonable cause to search a vehicle or premises, even if the science behind it is not supportive.