3 ms·
Looks like Danny's article on wikipedia has now come under scrutiny: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Sullivan_(technologist) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da
by spullara 15y ago
Looks like Danny's article on wikipedia has now come under scrutiny:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Sullivan_(technologist) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Sullivan_(technologist)
"The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. (November 2011)"
Personally, I think the notability guidelines are pretty outrageous and wildly out of date. I mean, how long before there aren't any "legitimate publications" by their standard?
- yuvipanda 15y agoQuoting from the talk page: > Given the extensive list of sources covering this individual above, please explain exactly how the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. If others agree, the tag can be restored - but you cannot tag an article that meets the criteria simply because you don't like them. --Jezebel'sPonyo And the tag has been removed.