2 ms·
> The lighter weight helps offset the other environmental impacts. Only when the minimal amount is used. Clamshell packaging is almost always incredibly wastef
by Schroedingersat 4y ago
> The lighter weight helps offset the other environmental impacts.
Only when the minimal amount is used. Clamshell packaging is almost always incredibly wasteful and could be replaced by less weight of cardboard. Plastic jars and similar could often be bags or pouches. etc.
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoYep, which EPR covers. For example, British milk sellers mostly use the same shared milk container, with different labels. They figured out how to lower the cost, because they were paying for it. They get really in depth in the specific amounts of dye to use in lids etc. to maximise recycling. https://wrap.org.uk/resources/report/hdpe-milk-bottle-research-and-development https://wrap.org.uk/resources/report/hdpe-milk-bottle-resear... None of that needed specific regulations, just assigning the costs to the people responsible.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoThere's still inertia and favouring of status quo even in that example. Milk bags have been in use in some places for decades, pack better, are lighter and use less plastic than a bottle lid. Other places do not use them for no particular reason.
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoI'm not promising immediate perfection, just economic incentives that point in that direction, rather than 180° opppsite.