4 ms·
> the org wasn't capable or willing to fix them Probably this. Can't fix everything, and the bugs piling up demoralizes many engineers. Six months is a bit low
by dj_mc_merlin 4y ago
> the org wasn't capable or willing to fix them
Probably this. Can't fix everything, and the bugs piling up demoralizes many engineers. Six months is a bit low, I'd go higher, but there's no point having a bug on your board that you're not realistically actually going to fix.
- gspr 4y agoBut the proposed action isn't to fix the bugs, it's to delete the documentation of the bugs! Closing your eyes don't make a problem go away. Surely the engineers understand that too, and won't get a moral boost from ignoring the known problems.
- KingOfCoders 4y agoI did not suggest to ignore the known problems: "and we implement ways to not reach high bug levels again" I suggest to close bug reports of bugs that will never get fixed.
- gspr 4y ago> I suggest to close bug reports of bugs that will never get fixed. OK. We still disagree about whether that is smart, but one thing is sure: that's not what you wrote originally.