4 ms·
Yes, because he's far too professional to do that without ironclad proof. And even if he had ironclad proof, he might still not go public.
by sgjohnson 4y ago
Yes, because he's far too professional to do that without ironclad proof.
And even if he had ironclad proof, he might still not go public.
- Cthulhu_ 4y agoIf he had ironclad proof, he'd hand it over to the arbitration committee / judges; it's not very professional I think to accuse people directly, even with proof.