3 ms·
> I prefer not to use free services because they're not sustainable, and they usually come with strings attached When I checked Dreamhost several years ago, I
by AnonC 4y ago
> I prefer not to use free services because they're not sustainable, and they usually come with strings attached
When I checked Dreamhost several years ago, I found that it was also an oversold service that relied on most customers using way less than the promised capacity. This doesn’t mean that it’s bad at hosting websites, but it’s not something I wanted to pay for.
So I hosted my websites with Nearly Free Speech (NFSN), where hosting is actually by what you consume. For small static sites, you could get a lot more mileage with NFSN and still not pay more than a couple of dollars a month. It’s a lot cheaper than your Dreamhost plan, and is truly sustainable because NFSN gets very close to recovering its costs plus a little more to sustain, grow and become better. NFSN also doesn’t have tricks like referral programs and other special discounts, unlike Dreamhost (talking from what I’ve seen about Dreamhost in the past).
The major downside is it doesn’t have cPanel and fancy application installers. But that shouldn’t be an issue for people who would use scp to setup web pages on a host.
- chubot 4y agoSure, NearlyFreeSpeech is probably closer to the ideal I'm talking about, but I happen to use Dreamhost. My point was that shared hosting exists, is good, and is the right solution to this problem. My point was not that you should use Dreamhost :) I tried NearlyFreeSpeech a few years ago; some sibling comments describe my experiences