> The first is that the Fahrenheit scale wasn't built around a range of human feeling How and why Fahrenheit was developed is completely immaterial: what is ma

> The first is that the Fahrenheit scale wasn't built around a range of human feeling How and why Fahrenheit was developed is completely immaterial: what is material is whether and how its range is of value to its users now. > Every time I need to think in Fahrenheit (which tends to only be online debates about this very topic), I can't picture anything clearly even with the purported 0 to 100 concept. Your argument is "because I'm not used to Fahrenheit, it must not offer an advantage to people used to it"? Really? C'mon.