> A group of anonymous internet "trolls" attacking and harassing an individual or the individual who can't do anything to stop it? The comparison isn't to the

> A group of anonymous internet "trolls" attacking and harassing an individual or the individual who can't do anything to stop it? The comparison isn't to the people who are being harassed randomly. It's between two "mobs", the Twitter one and the KF one. > Freedom of speech may protect against government consequences but it doesn't protect against social consequences. The legal concept doesn't, but the ideal (and the social norm) does.