4 ms·
You could absolutely have it both ways if both parties agree to those terms though. If the agreement is for the work to be performed by a specific person, eithe
by TheNewsIsHere 4y ago
You could absolutely have it both ways if both parties agree to those terms though. If the agreement is for the work to be performed by a specific person, either in word or intent, then it could be breach of contract.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 4y agoAbsolutely! My point is that if you are making an agreement for a specific person to perform the work instead of worrying about the outcome itself, perhaps you are really seeking employment instead of a contractual agreement.
- leetrout 4y agoBingo. This whole thread got super litigious around my comment that there is a defendable reality where people subcontract what you contracted them to do. It all depends on the contract wording. Good counter example to me defending be able to subcontract would be performance agreements (e.g. I pay Foo Fighters $1m for a concert they can't send Weird Al in their place).