4 ms·
68k isn’t hard to understand, either. I think what helped most was that programs were small and that no tricks were necessary or even possible to be efficient
by Someone 4y ago
68k isn’t hard to understand, either.
I think what helped most was that programs were small and that no tricks were necessary or even possible to be efficient w.r.t. cache misses.
If Linux ran on some multi-gigahertz 64-bit evolution of the 6502 the instruction set would still be simple, but a few Gigabytes of 6502 code still would be a challenge to understand, more so if that 6502 were out of order, speculatively executing, multi-core, and various parts of the code were written taking that into account.
- zozbot234 4y agoIndeed, the 68k ISA is comparatively clean for a traditional CISC architecture, but early RISC were regarded as even simpler and easier to understand.