3 ms·
In other news, IMDB (which Amazon owns it seems) has a strange bug (certainly an accident and coincidence /s) that you can't see any of the written reviews of R
by tomkarho 4y ago
In other news, IMDB (which Amazon owns it seems) has a strange bug (certainly an accident and coincidence /s) that you can't see any of the written reviews of Rings of Power that are under 6 stars. And yet, House of the Dragon works just fine in that department. How very odd.
- dmix 4y agoiMDB said they deleted all negative reviews. That was yesterday. Today they announced the ban on all new reviews. https://old.reddit.com/r/lotr/comments/x46870/imdb_have_deleted_all_the_negative_reviews_for/ https://old.reddit.com/r/lotr/comments/x46870/imdb_have_dele... It's a feature not a bug.
- lunias 4y agohttps://www.metacritic.com/tv/the-lord-of-the-rings-the-rings-of-power/season-1/user-reviews https://www.metacritic.com/tv/the-lord-of-the-rings-the-ring... I haven't trusted IMDB for years. Reviews certainly aren't everything; "bad" art can still be loveable to some, but I'm at the point where I just avoid anything attached to a preexisting franchise; lest I become enveloped by cynicism.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- echelon 4y agoHBO (Discovery+?) should sue and claim damages for trust-related preferential treatment. This is clearly an instance of a multi-industry-spanning giant preferring its own content. They're giving it away for free / as a loss leader, and yet they were able to spend enormous institutional capital on it. How can any production company compete? This is overwhelmingly monopolistic.