2 ms·
> Solar and wind have so far not been nearly adequate to charge existing EVs, let alone what would be necessary if we all converted to EVs. This is categorical
by onlyrealcuzzo 4y ago
> Solar and wind have so far not been nearly adequate to charge existing EVs, let alone what would be necessary if we all converted to EVs.
This is categorically false.
We already produce >10x as much wind energy alone that all BEVs in the US consume.
We already produce orders of magnitude more hydro electricity than we need for every passenger vehicle in the US to be a BEV.
- WalterBright 4y ago> This is categorically false. Yet California urged customers to not charge their EVs during peak hours because there isn't enough electricity available. And EVs are still only a tiny percentage of cars. > hydro is a doomed power source, because rivers are drying up, suitable sites are rare, and no new ones will be built because of environmental concerns. Existing ones get blown up. https://www.nps.gov/olym/learn/nature/dam-removal.htm https://www.nps.gov/olym/learn/nature/dam-removal.htm BTW, a lot of PNW hydro power gets sold to California, which still has to tell people not to charge their EVs.
- mercutio2 4y agoTo be fair, Californians were asked not to charge between 4pm and 9pm. There’s plenty of capacity over night. If we’d built car-to-grid infrastructure, EVs would be helping load shift, and they’re already not hurting in most cases, because we’re mostly not charging during peak consumption hours.