> Nobody has ever suggested that Asshurt was a part of the daily stormer, she wasn't. Then why link the slurs at all to accompany the argument? > It was also

> Nobody has ever suggested that Asshurt was a part of the daily stormer, she wasn't. Then why link the slurs at all to accompany the argument? > It was also a bizarre choice to defend weev, both from a legal and moral point of view. tptacek explained it well at the time https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5978686 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5978686 On that same page you linked there are about as many people in favor as against, tptacek's word is not the law regardless of his competency, and it sure wasn't as uncontroversial as you make it out to be.