Actually, I would not expect them to be. There's inherently a risk from a vaccine because there is inherently a risk from riling up the immune system. Note, h

Actually, I would not expect them to be. There's inherently a risk from a vaccine because there is inherently a risk from riling up the immune system. Note, however, that almost all the effects blamed on the vaccine are also effects we see with the virus. Does this not strongly suggest that what we are actually seeing is how the body reacts to the spike protein? If so, that means that if the patients got the real thing they would have the same or worse outcome? Realistically, the comparison shouldn't be vaccine vs nothing, but vaccine vs infection--and by that yardstick they aren't even in the same ballpark.