There is no replication problem here. It's a matter of opinion, mostly. I'm assuming since the article is paywalled, most people aren't reading and instead app

There is no replication problem here. It's a matter of opinion, mostly. I'm assuming since the article is paywalled, most people aren't reading and instead applying their own biases. The challenging researchers are simply implying that the original study did not account for the positive effects of red meat (vaguely 'vitamins and minerals).