3 ms·
for me the following things stand out use common lisp (sbcl) if you want c-level performance use common lisp if you want to make optimizing compilers use com
by medo-bear 4y ago
for me the following things stand out
use common lisp (sbcl) if you want c-level performance
use common lisp if you want to make optimizing compilers
use common lisp if you want smalltalk type repl driven interactive development
- rscho 4y agoI'm not a compiler expert by any means, but I would've thought the more functional nature of racket to be a plus for writing compilers. Plus, there's the nanopass framework.
- lispm 4y agoThere is no shortage of Lisp compilers. The new Racket compiler was derived from the Chez Scheme compiler.
- medo-bear 4y agoohh ... almost forgot ... CLOS https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System