3 ms·
Ah, yes. I imagine if you read "killed with a handgun" you'll go out replying "actually, killed by a bullet"
by thefz 4y ago
Ah, yes. I imagine if you read "killed with a handgun" you'll go out replying "actually, killed by a bullet"
- lotsofpulp 4y agoContext is important. The point of writing “the car was used to murder someone” was to show that in this story, it was just as nonsensical to claim the AirTag was used to murder someone. samatman: It seems relevant that the most shocking story they could put together was about someone who found the AirTag and got a protection order against their stalker. SadTrombone then links to what they think is a more shocking story because the AirTags were presumably part of a plan to murder someone. Me: points out that SadTrombone’s story is not more shocking because the AirTag was used to track, or stalk, but not as part of a plan to murder someone, as was insinuated. I think the original story of a stalker stalking an ex is more shocking than someone stalking their girlfriend/boyfriend to verify if they are cheating. Most people would simply break up at this point, but that this girlfriend became enraged enough to cause violence or kill is unrelated to AirTags.