3 ms·
Interesting. You point all the bad things the author did in regard to wikipedia's process, which I suppose is fair. But at the same time, you don't really mak
by j_baker 15y ago
Interesting. You point all the bad things the author did in regard to wikipedia's process, which I suppose is fair. But at the same time, you don't really make a compelling argument that the person in question doesn't belong in wikipedia.
Should I take this to mean that the merits of the article in question are secondary to Wikipedia's processes?
- mangodrunk 15y agoI will take your comment as your ability to ignore all the comments showing how the article was correctly deleted.
- j_baker 15y agoYou might also take it as my inability to see comments that didn't yet exist.