4 ms·
Not only possible but proven. There are cases where people who suffered extremely severe adverse effects right after vaccination, were recorded by the trial ope
by origin_path 4y ago
Not only possible but proven. There are cases where people who suffered extremely severe adverse effects right after vaccination, were recorded by the trial operators as having minor ailments or even having had COVID despite negative tests, e.g. as in this case:
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/23/concerns-of-fraud-in-pfizer-vaccine-trial-as-participants-hospitalisation-with-heart-inflammation-is-swept-under-carpet/ https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/23/concerns-of-fraud-in-pfi...
Another similar problem in which a trial participant appears to have died a day or two after taking the shot, but it was ruled unrelated (by Pfizer!):
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/pfizer-study-subject-c4591001-1162 https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/pfizer-study-subject-c4591...
- LorenPechtel 4y agoSo? He had a multitude of health issues. People with a multitude of health issues sometimes die. And that report is obviously garbage--it refers to the "police report" of why he died. Nope, the police don't determine why someone died--they're only reporting what a medical examiner said. Why should Pfizer question it? Your link is clearly to a dishonest site.
- origin_path 4y agoThe examiner wouldn't have known he was taking an experimental medical substance just a day or two before death, so obviously that assessment of cause of death would be incomplete. This is covered in the article and is basic common sense. It is dishonest of Pfizer to take the cause of death as assessed by someone who was lacking critical facts especially given the extremely strong temporal correlation.